S.100,if plea of self defence had not been explicitly taken during the trial, either in the statement under A.342 CrPC or at the time of cross examination the prosection witnesses, yet it remained open to the court to infer the same from evidence led during the trial.
2018 P Cr2018 P Cr. L J Note 175 [Lahore] Before Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, J MUHAMMAD AZAM—Petitioner Versus The STATE and another—Respondents Criminal Miscellaneous No. 99700-B of 2017, decided on 3rd April, 2018. Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)— —-S. 497—Child Marriage Restraint Act (XIX of 1929)—Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 365-B & […]
joint account holders, liability of—Scope—Complainant had allegedly provided a loan to the accused-lady (applicant) and her husband/co-accused—Accused and her husband/co-accused issued cheques to the complainant from a joint account —Said cheques were dishonoured—Court below directed the Magistrate to issue process against the accused for joining her in the trial—Complainant contended that accused was negotiating for […]
S. 489-F—Criminal and civil proceedings—Maintainability—Maxim that ‘a man should not be vexed twice’—Applicability—Trial court acquitted the accused on the ground that criminal proceedings were not maintainable as civil suit regarding the disputed amount of cheque had already been decreed in favour of the complainant—Findings of the Trial Court regarding non-maintainability of the criminal proceedings in […]
S.489-F—Ad interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of—Accused, Managing director /Chief Executive Officer of a limited company which had gone into liquidation and where a liquidator also had been appointed, was alleged to have issued cheques of the value of Rs.2,84,096 in consideration of supply of cotton to the Spinning Mill owned by said limited company—Bank had […]